airport_transferbarbathtubbusiness_facilitieschild_activitieschildcareconnecting_roomcribsfree_wifigymhot_tubinternetkitchennon_smokingpetpoolresturantski_in_outski_shuttleski_storagesmoking_areaspastar
Sign In
Sections
Follow Us
Photo: Pexels
Photo: Pexels
Unsaved itemCreated with Sketch.

In These Cities, Exercising Outdoors Does More Harm than Good

Picture of Esme Benjamin
Wellness Editor
Updated: 27 February 2017
If you diligently cycle to work to ensure you hit daily exercise targets you might be shocked to learn that, depending on where you live, it might be worse for your health than taking public transport.

In its latest pollution report using data from the World Health Organization (WHO), the Guardian identified cities across the globe where pollution levels are particularly dire. So dire, that after just 30 minutes of outdoor cycling or walking the benefits of cardio are negated by the detrimental effects of contaminated air.

The cities with the biggest issue are: Kaduna (Nigeria), Bamenda (Cameroon), Yunbu (Saudi Arabia), Kampala (Uganda), Tetovo (FYR Macedonia), Baghdad (Iraq), Doha (Qatar), Zabol (Iran), Gwalior (India), Alwar (India), Allahabad (India), Chittagong (Bangladesh), Beijing (China), Wuhan (China).

Researchers calculated the amount of time when the health payoff of exercise was outweighed by the danger of pollution, the “breakeven point,” and currently western commuters have nothing to fear.

“The benefits of active travel outweighed the harm from air pollution in all but the most extreme air pollution concentrations,” Audrey de Nazelle, one of the authors of the report, told the Guardian. “It is not currently an issue for healthy adults in Europe in general.”

That being said, last month London’s pollution levels exceeded those of Beijing — a city with a breakeven point of under an hour. The health hazards of pollution can be severe, so try to avoid cycling along the busiest junctions, no matter where you live.